The Conflict Tree: Understanding Responses to Disagreements

What happens when a disagreement escalates into chaos, leaving chaos in its wake? Conflict is like a storm—it can come out of nowhere, grow intense, and leave a mark. However, just like with storms, how we prepare and respond makes all the difference. The “Responses to Conflict” tree beautifully illustrates the various ways people handle disagreements, from avoidance to confrontation, and the choices we make within each approach.

What Are The Responses to Conflict About?

Imagine this “responses to conflict” as a tree, where the branches represent various approaches to handling conflict. The tree splits into three main pathways: Avoidance, Diffusion, and Confrontation. Let’s consider a workplace scenario involving a team project that isn’t meeting deadlines due to a lack of communication.

  • Avoidance is like putting your head in the sand—ignoring the problem, masking feelings, or postponing action. It might work for a short while, but unresolved conflicts tend to resurface like weeds in a garden. Consider one team member, feeling overwhelmed by the project’s demands, decides to ignore the issue. They continue to work individually, avoiding any discussions about the project’s delays, much like putting their head in the sand. While this allows them to avoid conflict temporarily, the lack of communication means the project continues to suffer, and tensions with other team members begin to grow.
  • Diffusion involves delaying confrontation by waiting or pausing. This can sometimes be wise, like letting a cake cool before slicing it, but without proper follow-up, the problem may persist. Imagine another team member realises there’s a problem but opts to wait and see if the situation resolves itself, thinking that bringing it up might create unnecessary tension. They might wait for a team meeting or pause their work, hoping things will improve on their own. This approach can be wise for a short while but ultimately leads to further delays if no one takes action to address the underlying issues.
  • Confrontation is a direct approach and can go in two directions: violently or non-violently. Staying with our example, the project manager finally decides to confront the issue directly during a team meeting.
    • Violent confrontation: If the project manager approaches the meeting with anger, blaming team members for the lack of progress, this could lead to shouting, defensiveness, and a hostile environment—akin to pouring gasoline on a fire.
    • Nonviolent confrontation: Instead, the project manager can use a constructive approach, inviting team members to share their perspectives, facilitating a discussion that seeks to understand everyone’s challenges, and working collaboratively to devise a plan to get back on track. This nurturing approach is similar to watering a plant, helping everyone thrive and work together effectively. This is a more constructive route, utilising discussion, understanding, and compromise—much like watering a thirsty plant rather than pulling it out by its roots. (Learn more)

Through this example, it becomes clear how these different responses to a problem can significantly impact team dynamics and project outcomes.

Why Does This Matter?

Conflict is a part of life, whether it occurs in families, friendships, workplaces, or even within ourselves. How we handle it determines whether relationships grow or wither. Imagine two colleagues disagreeing about a project. One could react angrily (leading to a violent confrontation), ignore the issue (leading to avoidance), or communicate and find a solution (through nonviolent confrontation). The approach taken will shape their future interactions.

This model also highlights that conflict doesn’t have to be destructive—it can be an opportunity for growth, collaboration, and change. Much like a tree that sheds old leaves to grow new ones, handling conflict properly helps us develop resilience and emotional intelligence, offering a hopeful perspective on the potential outcomes of conflict resolution.

How Can We Apply This?

  1. Recognise your natural tendency. Do you avoid conflict, delay responses, or face it head-on? Understanding your default reaction can help you choose a better approach, empowering you to take control of your conflict resolution strategies.
  2. Shift towards nonviolent confrontation. Instead of escalating tensions, focus on communication, listening, and collaboration—much like a gardener tending to plants with care rather than uprooting them in frustration. This emphasis on specific actions provides a clear guide for effective conflict resolution, reassuring the audience that they are on the right path.
  3. Emphasize problem-solving. Aim to resolve issues, not just express frustration. A disagreement doesn’t have to mean one person wins and another loses; like a recipe, the best results come from blending the right ingredients.

Conflict is like a tree—it has deep roots, branches in different directions, and the potential to grow strong or become fragile. The choice is ours. When we choose constructive, peaceful ways to address disagreements, we help cultivate a forest of cooperation rather than a barren landscape of hostility.

This model of conflict resolution, often linked to studies in psychology and behavioural science, serves as a guide to help us navigate disagreements with wisdom and patience. Next time a conflict arises, ask yourself: Am I nurturing this conflict or letting it grow?

#ConflictResolution #CommunicationSkills #EmotionalIntelligence #ProblemSolving #SelfAwareness #GrowthMindset #Teamwork #DisputeResolution #HealthyRelationships #Leadership

ADDITIONAL ARTICLES

Share this article
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Email